Snapshot
Continue to About ↓- What it does
- Macroscope is an AI code review and engineering status platform that reviews pull requests and local CLI changes for correctness, security, tests, and regressions before merge.
More detail
- It also summarizes changes across repos for engineering leaders and offers Murmur (beta) to orchestrate cloud coding agents in isolated sandboxes.
- Best for
- Engineering teams on GitHub with pull-request-heavy workflows that want automated review and approval gating, and engineering or product leaders who want commit summaries, productivity trends, and ground-truth engineering allocation.
- Pricing
- Usage-based, with no monthly subscription required.
More detail
- Code Review is $0.05 per KB reviewed with a 10 KB minimum per review — roughly 55¢ average for a Budget review and 76¢ for a Balanced review, with the smallest Balanced review at 50¢.
- Status is $0.05 per commit.
- Agent credits covering Check Run Age
- Main limitation
- Very small or low-volume teams, since every review is billed on a 10 KB minimum, and teams using non-GitHub or self-hosted Git, where support is not published.
- Record
- Living and monitored
- Reviewed
- Evidence
- Public web research
- Machine access
- Structured profile ↗
About
- Macroscope is an AI code review and engineering status platform that reviews pull requests and local CLI changes for correctness, security, tests, and regressions before merge.
- It also summarizes changes across repos for engineering leaders and offers Murmur (beta) to orchestrate cloud coding agents in isolated sandboxes.
What it helps with
- Bugs and security issues in pull requests reaching merge before they are caught
- Review bottlenecks caused by code volume from AI coding agents
- Engineering leaders lacking visibility into what changed, why, and where effort goes
- Onboarding and researching an unfamiliar codebase through natural-language questions
Capabilities
A practical view of what is available and where limitations apply.
| Offering | Available | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Pull request code review | Yes | Checks changes for correctness, security, tests, and regressions before merge. |
| Auto-approve and merge criteria (Approvability) | Yes | Configure criteria for automatically approving or merging changes; billed in agent credits. |
| Fix it for me | Yes | Generates an auto-PR fix; billed in agent credits. |
| Custom repo-convention instructions and ignore rules | Yes | Tailors review to repository conventions. |
| Check Run Agents | Yes | Custom checks with their own instructions, model, and tools. |
| Status reporting and weekly digest | Yes | Commit summaries grouped into areas, productivity tracking for developers and agents, weekly email digest, and Slack subscriptions. |
| Macros (scheduled reports) and Webhooks | Yes | Scheduled reporting and webhook delivery. |
| Ask Macroscope | Yes | Natural-language Q&A about the codebase. |
| Murmur cloud coding agents | Limited | Beta; agents write code and verify their work in isolated sandboxes via Slack, GitHub, or API. |
| GitLab or Bitbucket support | Unknown | Not stated on published pages; historically required GitHub Cloud. |
Bot trust
How confidently AI systems can verify this profile from public evidence.
—of 100
ChatGPT—/100
Claude—/100
This profile has not completed a Bot Score assessment yet.
Evidence
Where this record came from, when it was reviewed, and how confidently it can be used.
- Verification
- Scribble researched these facts from the linked public sources.
- The owner has not manually confirmed every field.
- Last reviewed
- Primary source
- macroscope.com
Technical profile details
Record ID
2ab0c15e-f5f5-4743-93d8-1755f02b6211Canonical URLhttps://profiles.scribble.network/listing/macroscope-2ab0c15e