Snapshot
Continue to About ↓- What it does
- Luciq (formerly Instabug) is a mobile observability platform that embeds a lightweight SDK in iOS, Android, React Native and Flutter apps to capture crashes, ANRs, engagement and sentiment signals across every session, then ranks them into a prioritized queue.
More detail
- Its Companion and Autopilot layers attach root cause and repro steps and can open fixes as pull requests behind guarded releases, and it exposes context to AI agents via MCP, CLI and API.
- It covers mobile app quality and product signals only, not backend or web observability.
- Best for
- Mobile engineering, product and leadership teams running iOS, Android, React Native or Flutter apps who want crash, performance, funnel and sentiment signals in one place, especially teams working alongside AI coding agents.
More detail
- Also fits enterprise mobile orgs needing SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, SSO/SAML/SCIM and audit logs.
- Pricing
- One plan priced on Daily Active Users plus member seats, with full platform access
More detail
- DAU is billed on the higher of third-party app-store data or first-party SDK telemetry, reviewed on a rolling 6-month average twice a year.
- Luciq states there are no charges for logs, sessions, traces, crash limits o
- Main limitation
- Web-only, desktop or backend-only teams, since Luciq captures client-side mobile context and does not replace server observability.
More detail
- Not aimed at solo or hobby developers, as pricing is DAU-and-seat based with no published self-serve free tier.
- Record
- Living and monitored
- Reviewed
- Evidence
- Public web research
- Machine access
- Structured profile ↗
About
- Luciq (formerly Instabug) is a mobile observability platform that embeds a lightweight SDK in iOS, Android, React Native and Flutter apps to capture crashes, ANRs, engagement and sentiment signals across every session, then ranks them into a prioritized queue.
- Its Companion and Autopilot layers attach root cause and repro steps and can open fixes as pull requests behind guarded releases, and it exposes context to AI agents via MCP, CLI and API.
- It covers mobile app quality and product signals only, not backend or web observability.
What it helps with
- Mobile teams use many tools yet miss mobile-specific frustration signals like frozen frames, dead taps and silent checko
- AI coding agents only see the repository codebase, not live in-app state, so they lack context to fix production issues
- Engineering time is spent hunting and deduplicating issues instead of reviewing fixes
- Product teams struggle to decide what to build next rather than how to build it
- Crash and performance issues are tracked as tickets without being tied to revenue, conversion or retention impact
Capabilities
A practical view of what is available and where limitations apply.
| Offering | Available | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Session capture without sampling | Yes | One SDK captures 100% of sessions with zero sampling per official FAQ; SDK stated as under 1MB |
| Crash, ANR, OOM and hang detection | Yes | Includes slow launches, network errors, frozen frames and AI-detected visual issues |
| Companion triage layer | Yes | Auto-prioritization, duplicate grouping, root cause analysis and repro steps |
| Autopilot automated fixes | Yes | Opens pull requests and rolls out behind guarded releases that halt on degradation |
| Agent interfaces (MCP, CLI, API) | Yes | Delivers context to Claude, Cursor or custom agents running on the customer's own keys |
| Product analytics and sentiment | Yes | Funnels, rage and dead taps, app store reviews, in-app surveys and ranked opportunities |
| Published dollar pricing | No | Only DAU-plus-seat model described; actual amounts require booking a demo |
| Self-serve free tier | No | No free plan published; entry is via demo or limited technical POC |
| Security certifications | Yes | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2022, GDPR/DPA, third-party pen tests, SSO/SAML/SCIM, RBAC, audit logs |
| Backend or web app observability | No | Explicitly mobile-only and positioned as client-side context no backend tool can capture |
Bot trust
How confidently AI systems can verify this profile from public evidence.
—of 100
ChatGPT—/100
Claude—/100
This profile has not completed a Bot Score assessment yet.
Evidence
Where this record came from, when it was reviewed, and how confidently it can be used.
- Verification
- Scribble researched these facts from the linked public sources.
- The owner has not manually confirmed every field.
- Last reviewed
- Primary source
- luciq.ai
Technical profile details
Record ID
9ee45a72-0c98-49a7-8ab9-7f7b333950beCanonical URLhttps://profiles.scribble.network/listing/luciq-9ee45a72