Snapshot
Continue to About ↓- What it does
- Seezo Inc. provides a SaaS product, the Seezo SDR App, that automates security design reviews and threat modeling for software features before code is written.
More detail
- It reads design-stage inputs from tools like Jira, Confluence, Google Docs, Slack, SharePoint, and ServiceNow, extracts components, data flows, and trust boundaries, and generates threat models, attack paths, and security requirements mapped to your organization's standards.
- Best for
- Application security and security architecture teams at fast-shipping engineering organizations that need to scale design-stage reviews beyond crown-jewel features and enforce consistent internal standards.
More detail
- Security consulting firms delivering security design reviews across client engagements.
- Pricing
- Pricing is not publicly listed.
More detail
- Seezo's site offers 'Start for free' and 'Book a walkthrough' but publishes no price, plan tiers, per-assessment fees, seat minimums, lockups, or usage limits.
- No public evidence of subscription or usage-based charges was found, and 'free' cannot be inferred from the absence of a monthly su
- Main limitation
- Buyers who need a published price, plan structure, or clearly defined free-tier limits before committing — the site says 'Start for free' but discloses no fees, limits, or terms.
More detail
- Teams looking for runtime code scanning (SAST/DAST) rather than design-stage review.
- Record
- Living and monitored
- Reviewed
- Evidence
- Public web research
- Machine access
- Structured profile ↗
About
- Seezo Inc. provides a SaaS product, the Seezo SDR App, that automates security design reviews and threat modeling for software features before code is written.
- It reads design-stage inputs from tools like Jira, Confluence, Google Docs, Slack, SharePoint, and ServiceNow, extracts components, data flows, and trust boundaries, and generates threat models, attack paths, and security requirements mapped to your organization's standards.
What it helps with
- Manual security design reviews take weeks, creating bottlenecks that delay or skip review entirely
- Manual review coverage is incomplete, typically limited to crown-jewel features
- Security standards enforcement varies by reviewer and region, producing inconsistent outcomes
- Security is treated as a gate rather than embedded in developer workflows
- AI-generated security recommendations are often black-box and get questioned or ignored
Capabilities
A practical view of what is available and where limitations apply.
| Offering | Available | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Automated threat modeling and security design reviews | Yes | Generates threat models, attack paths, and security requirements from design-stage inputs in minutes, per vendor |
| Architecture extraction | Yes | Identifies components, data flows, and trust boundaries from design documents and tickets |
| Custom rules engine and internal standards mapping | Yes | Configure custom rules, glossary, and remediation guidance to reflect organizational standards |
| Findings delivered to developer workflows | Yes | Pushes findings to Jira, Slack, Google Doc comments, Linear, and ServiceNow; supports 1-click exportable reports |
| Explainability of recommendations | Yes | Decision-tree reasoning, relevant standards, and source input shown for each recommendation |
| Seezo Agent | Yes | In-app and Slack agent for natural-language guidance, querying assessments, analytics, and organizational knowledge |
| Seezo AI Plugin for coding agents | Yes | MCP server and skills for Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex |
| Published pricing | No | No public price, plan, or fee structure disclosed; 'Start for free' has no stated limits or terms |
| Public product documentation | Unknown | Terms link to seezo.io/docs, but no documentation content was supplied in the evidence |
| Independent third-party reviews | Unknown | No independent reviews or press coverage were found in the evidence; customer stories are vendor-hosted case studies |
Bot trust
How confidently AI systems can verify this profile from public evidence.
—of 100
ChatGPT—/100
Claude—/100
This profile has not completed a Bot Score assessment yet.
Evidence
Where this record came from, when it was reviewed, and how confidently it can be used.
- Verification
- Scribble researched these facts from the linked public sources.
- The owner has not manually confirmed every field.
- Last reviewed
- Primary source
- seezo.io
Technical profile details
Record ID
c3c496e3-4e3e-4331-80b8-3d1dba71ead0Canonical URLhttps://profiles.scribble.network/listing/seezo-c3c496e3