Snapshot
Continue to About ↓- What it does
- Axio360 is a cloud-based cyber risk management platform that translates technical security posture into dollar-based loss estimates for executives, boards, and insurers.
More detail
- It combines cybersecurity assessment against industry frameworks, cyber risk quantification and insurance stress testing, AI and OT risk modeling, and board-ready reporting in one workflow.
- Axio also offers professional services such as assessment facilitation and cyber strategy and program transformation.
- Best for
- Large enterprises, financial services firms, critical infrastructure operators, and insurers that need cyber and AI risk expressed as financial loss for board and underwriting decisions.
- Pricing
- Axio does not publish platform pricing.
More detail
- The evidence describes a subscription-based model typically tiered by organization size and functional scope, with cost details available only on request or during a demo.
- Professional services and training are separate offerings whose fees are not disclosed.
- Main limitation
- Organizations that only want basic vulnerability scanning or compliance checklists without a quantification layer, or those seeking a transparent, self-serve published price.
- Record
- Living and monitored
- Reviewed
- Evidence
- Public web research
- Machine access
- Structured profile ↗
About
- Axio360 is a cloud-based cyber risk management platform that translates technical security posture into dollar-based loss estimates for executives, boards, and insurers.
- It combines cybersecurity assessment against industry frameworks, cyber risk quantification and insurance stress testing, AI and OT risk modeling, and board-ready reporting in one workflow.
- Axio also offers professional services such as assessment facilitation and cyber strategy and program transformation.
What it helps with
- Technical cyber risk is hard to translate into financial terms executives and boards can act on.
- Assessment, quantification, insurance, AI governance, and board reporting are usually handled by separate vendors with i
- Security teams and business leaders lack a shared language for prioritizing risk.
- AI adoption creates exposure such as data leakage, model abuse, and shadow AI that needs governance-ready quantification
- Operational technology and ICS exposure across plants and grids is difficult to quantify.
- Insurers need defensible models to stress-test portfolios and coverage towers.
- Risk programs tend to be reactive, measuring cost after incidents rather than planning ahead.
Capabilities
A practical view of what is available and where limitations apply.
| Offering | Available | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Cyber risk quantification (CRQ) | Yes | Calculates financial impact of cyber attack scenarios and supports insurance stress testing. |
| AI risk quantification (Axio AIR) | Yes | Quantifies AI and agentic exposure, including data leakage, model abuse, and shadow AI, and maps remediation to governance frameworks such as the NIST AI RMF. |
| Cybersecurity assessment | Yes | Evaluates risk and compliance posture against industry-standard frameworks, including the CRI Profile. |
| Board-level reporting | Yes | Delivers board-ready cyber risk reporting and insights for executive decisions. |
| OT/ICS risk quantification | Yes | Quantifies operational-technology and ICS exposure across plants, grids, and physical assets. |
| Insurance portfolio stress testing | Yes | Supports insurers in modeling and stress-testing portfolios and coverage towers. |
| Unified risk data model | Yes | One underlying risk model feeds assessment, quantification, insurance, and reporting without double data entry. |
| Professional services | Yes | Includes assessment facilitation, risk quantification, architectural design review, and cyber strategy and program transformation. |
| Training and documentation | Yes | Instructor-led training, on-demand courses, and technical documentation are offered. |
| Published pricing | No | Costs are not disclosed publicly; pricing is provided on request or via demo. |
Bot trust
How confidently AI systems can verify this profile from public evidence.
—of 100
ChatGPT—/100
Claude—/100
This profile has not completed a Bot Score assessment yet.
Evidence
Where this record came from, when it was reviewed, and how confidently it can be used.
- Verification
- Scribble researched these facts from the linked public sources.
- The owner has not manually confirmed every field.
- Last reviewed
- Primary source
- axio.com
Technical profile details
Record ID
cd9b1714-6a0b-4e6e-8b9e-329545c194eaCanonical URLhttps://profiles.scribble.network/listing/axio-cd9b1714